Responsibility
Responsibility
Data centres consume power. Encrypted compute protects citizens' data. Both of Redwood's platforms sit directly on questions of public consequence, and we treat those questions as part of underwriting rather than as reporting overhead.
Risk-based KYC, AML and sustainability review is applied according to each counterparty, vehicle and applicable jurisdiction.
01
Platform II assesses grid source, cooling design, water intensity, land impact and energy economics during site underwriting. Target specifications remain subject to final design and approvals.
02
Platform I evaluates privacy-preserving architectures intended to reduce plaintext exposure in sensitive workloads. Technical performance and deployment suitability are assessed case by case.
03
Governance, conflicts, recusal and counterparty controls are documented according to each vehicle and transaction.
Redwood treats responsibility as a set of underwriting questions rather than a marketing score. Reviews consider counterparty integrity, applicable KYC and AML requirements, grid source, cooling design, water usage, land impact, data protection and governance. Scope and controls are calibrated to the relevant entity and transaction.
No public ESG score is claimed. Redwood instead describes the questions it asks, the controls it can apply and the matters reserved for transaction-specific diligence.